So! . . . You want Denniss Matthews Solicitors, to protect your interests and good name? They can’t even protect their own otherwise they wouldn’t be here.
THE DENNISS MATTHEWS GRANNY SWINDLERS PAGE . . I have wondered in the past if Denniss Matthews and IWG were in cahoots to defraud me. Documents received make that most likely.
CROYDON MET POLICE TWAT TEAM   . . WATCH 5 OFFICERS in two squad cars  RACE TO SEE A HOLE IN THE GROUND.
 Remarkable scenes.
 (bottom of this CLICK HERE page)
Read what the Law Society of England and Wales say about SPOOF SITES such as these. More DIRTY TRICKS   Click here.
SEE  WHAT SIR IAN BLAIR  SAYS ABOUT HIS MET POLICE CROYDON TWAT TEAM? OR POLICE ASSISTED TRESPASSING IF YOU ARE BLACK IN CROYDON? NO PROOF REQUIRED.   “This is not a matter for the Police” . . . Mark Stockford Crime Manager
READ THE RESULT OF THE PROMISED INVESTIGATION THAT MARK STOCKFORD, MADE INTO THE DISGRACEFUL “MATTER” OF THE  BEHAVIOUR OF HIS OFFICERS IN CROYDON . . . .  CLICK HERE
NEW
 Croydon Council’s Dirty Tricks Page.
wpc4f624f6_1b.jpg
Local Government Ombudsman. Jerry White washes report of Croydon Council maladministration.
Visit Daniel’s  Wanker Page on  Ingram Winter Green dot Org
London Met  Police give whole new meaning to . . . “Getting a Brazilian”

Mr Colin Cole
Friday, November 18, 2005

Daniel Ginsbury
Ingram Winter Green Solicitors
 Bedford House,
21a John Street
London WC1N 2BL

Heh! Dan  . . .  re Dispute 243 Portland Rd / Fineland Properties Ltd
I take it from the lack of your reply that you accept my terms of the 8th November. Kindly ask your clients to forward me the rest of my money £917. 37.
So what’s all this I’ve been hearing eh?
One of the benefits of having so many prominent web sites (have you done a search on IWG solicitors lately, or particularly you, you’re the most famous Daniel on the web right now, I bet you cant bear to watch can you? And that Teitelbaum guy gets a page to himself now) is that people start sending you stuff. . . they see someone who is not scared of you . . ME . . and they start getting brave themselves.

I have seen documents that indicate that you Daniel Ginsbury in conjunction with your mates at Denniss Matthews and Nathan Teitelbaum of Fineland Properties Ltd regularly conspire together to do this sort of thing. Will you take this opportunity to confirm or deny that? . .

I am also being made aware that you swindle old ladies out of Council House Right to Buy schemes and then make off with their money . . . . you’d be surprised how much stuff I’ve got on that. . . . . once again would you take this opportunity to confirm or deny that.  I will take a lack of reply from any of you as confirmation, entitling me to publish that as fact.   And if it is a fact I will get to the bottom of it . . you have my word on it . . as you can see I am copying this to The Metropolitan Police. . .

Yours Colin Clifford Cole.
     Mr Colin Cole
   
    Tuesday November 08, 2005

Daniel Ginsbury
Ingram Winter Green Solicitors
Bedford House,
21a John Street
London WC1N 2BL

Heh! Dan  . . .  re Dispute 243 Portland Rd / Fineland Properties Ltd

I am sure you are aware that I have still not had a reply from either you or your clients the Teitelbaums, regarding our insurance or the ground rent.

I presume then . . . that your client is intending to deduct these charges from the money he owes me for my Solicitors fees.

Which amounts to £1,010. 50 . . minus £25 and £68. 13

Which means he still owes me £917. 37

I will take a lack of reply within the week an acceptance of this.

Yours Colin Clifford Cole.

NO REPLY 10 DAYS LATER
http://society.guardian.co.uk/housing/story/0,7890,573045,00.html
Council in bid to stop housing scam

Matt Weaver
Friday October 12, 2001

A London borough is preparing to mount a legal challenge against a property scam involving former council homes amid growing evidence of widespread abuse of the right-to-buy rules that is adding to the capital's housing crisis.
Private property companies are increasingly targeting council tenants offering them cash incentives to exercise the right to buy their homes properties.
Under the current rules tenants can buy their own homes with a £38,000 discount. They have to pay this back if they sell off the homes within three years.
Under a legal but "morally dubious" scheme companies offer former tenants cash payments to move out as soon as they have bought their discounted homes.
The former council properties are then leased to the companies which then sublet them at market rates. The companies eventually buy up the homes but only after three years so that the former tenants can avoid repayment of the £38,000 discount.
The London borough of Hammersmith and Fulham  has evidence of contracts between former tenants and property companies that it is preparing to use to challenge the practice.
It is expected to argue in court that the contracts amount to the sale of the property within the three-year time limit.
A spokesman for the council refused to give any more details of the case.
In other areas companies target council estates with leaflets offering up to £15,000 to tenants that are prepared to move out. A flyer seen by SocietyGuardian.co.uk from the firm Deepdale Properties offers council tenants between £5,000 and £10,000 when they leave.
Another from the investment company Alliance and Mutual says: "Are you a council tenant thinking of giving up your tenancy? Don't, if you have been a council tenant for over 2 years there is a way whereby you could receive between £5,000-£15,000 when you leave."
Although the scheme is legal, Deepdale refused to comment.
Alliance and Mutual director Gary Bobbe, said: "The only way you can stop this happening is to change the legislation."
He claimed the scheme helped people who at the moment were "not in a position financially or intellectually to exercise their statutory right to buy".
Barnet council home ownership manager John Gargan said: "The former tenants are given a sum to clear off and the home is sublet to someone else."
He added: "It's legal, but it's morally dubious."
From emails, documents, letters and phone conversations . . lots or those . . . It seems that a large part of Fineland Properties empire . . (280 mortgages {gonna look into that} and £1.4 million profit at last count) is based on variations of the Right to Buy ‘scam’ listed below.
David Ingram, Colin Winter, Nicholas Green, Daniel Ginsbury, Nigel Matthews, Oliver Denniss, Michael Matthews, Catherine Spence, Nathan Teitelbaum, Ruth Teitelbaum are invited to deny that they are part of a scheme similar to that outlined below. . . . . NOT illegal as it clearly  shows . . . . except when you  defraud the owners/seller of the up front money that was promised. . . would any or all of these above care to write and deny they are part of such a scheme to defraud? And confirm or deny the following.
Legal maybe . . but when not content with the ‘scam’ money they also withhold the incentive money as well . . . That’s when the Police should get involved.
So how does this work eh?
http://www.camdennewjournal.co.uk/archive/n120603_8.htm

Rottweiler chases the house swindlers
A special investigation by Richard Osley reveals a scam which has made
conmen rich by sub-letting council flats that should have gone to needy families
SWINDLERS are netting thousands of pounds by illegally renting out council homes in a scam which is clogging up the waiting list for accommodation. Camden Council has recovered 45 properties in the last 12 months from the hands of swindlers but a council insider confirmed: “We do not how big the problem is.” The New Journal can reveal that fraudsters who have obtained council tenancies are then renting the flats out in a lucrative sub-letting sideline.

Meanwhile homeless families are stuck in bed and breakfast accommodation while they wait for homes to become available. The council insider said: “Some of the fraud is very well hidden and difficult to prove. It might be that two tenants move in together and instead of giving up one of the properties they begin sub-letting it out. “People are shrewd and they know there is a lot of money to be made.”
Average council rent for a three-bedroomed flat is about £77 a week. But on the private market such a flat could fetch £200 a week. Some of the council’s most coveted properties in Holborn are a particular lure for the swindlers but sources have confirmed the problem is prevalent across the borough.

Scams have been uncovered in Gospel Oak, Camden Town and King’s Cross. Other cheats have been found living in private accommodation, or in homes outside the borough. Investigators revealed that the hunt for rogue tenants has led them across the country and as far afield as Spain. In the latest swindle, tenants who suspect Camden is investigating their operations are trying to escape penalties by seizing properties through their right-to-buy options. “If we lose them like that then we will never get them back,” a council source said.

Camden has hit back by bringing a string of rogue landlords to court and has successfully obtained rent arrears and possession orders on their homes. A highly-placed source said: “I’ve worked out that we have saved the council over a million pounds. We have to stop more resources being lost.” Speaking to the New Journal, Malcolm Jackson, from Camden’s illegal occupancy team, said: “What motivates me is the time people spend on the waiting list for homes because of somebody else’s greed. To keep a family in a bed and breakfast costs £15,000 a year and they shouldn’t be there.”

Mr Jackson – known as The Rottweiler among colleagues because of his door-to-door inquiries – added: “We’ve had one tenant who was living in Kingston-on-Thames. Another was living in Lincolnshire. We took one man to court and he was living in Spain. They come up with all sorts of excuses.” He added: “Sometimes the tenants who are renting the flats don’t know they are renting out council homes because the actual tenants will come and collect the rent so regularly. “At the moment they can be advertised in letting agencies because there is no law at present to say an agency must be shown proof of ownership.”

The team of investigators trawls family records for clues hidden in scores of birth and marriage certificates and school records.  “They are now  hoping that neighbours of suspected illegal occupants will ring a hotline set up to gather intelligence on where the racket has spread to,” added Mr Jackson. “It is not a case of grassing them up. All tenants know how long they waited on the waiting list. In a good week we will get ten to 15 calls. Every call is investigated.”

Tip-offs also come from the district housing office and the police, although anti-social behaviour and criminal activity are not always indications that the property is a rogue let. “In a lot of cases they don’t want to draw attention to themselves. They can be model tenants. In some cases we know that a flat is being sub-let but we can’t prove it. We can only bring a case to court once we think we have enough evidence to convince the judge,” Mr Jackson said. It is understood that swindlers are hoping to cash in on flats on the Maiden Lane Estate in King’s Cross because rents are expected to become more lucrative when the redevelopment of the area is completed. Mr Jackson said: “There was one case where a tenant tried to buy the flat he was subletting on the Maiden Lane estate for £75,000. They think it will be a potential goldmine when the rail link is finished.”

The New Journal revealed in April how  a fraudster renting out a two-bedroom flat in Holborn had been ordered to repay £5,928 in rent arrears by justices at Clerkenwell County Court. Investigators proved the tenant had been living in Southwark with his wife and daughter. In another case a rogue landlord in King’s Cross who rented out a council flat to two students at the London School of Economics raked in more than £4,000 a month. The money was untaxed and the offender was also claiming benefits.

Investigators also recall a Mr Big who was collecting rent from up to six flats in Gospel Oak. A fraudbuster, who did not wish to be named, said: “He used to drive around in a Mercedes collecting all the rent from the flats but it was difficult for us to get the evidence at first.” After tip-offs, the unit later snared the swindler and recovered the properties. Mr Big escaped justice by fleeing to Eastern Europe. Further court cases are in the pipeline but Camden is now hoping tougher penalties will be handed out to sub-let racketeers.
Mr Jackson said: “We are talking with our legal team to see whether we can press criminal charges under the Theft Act and the Illegal Attempts Act. This could then lead to a prison sentence.”
From http://www.unjustis.co.uk/Alerts/Lawyers_for_your_business.htm
When choosing a solicitor, or if trying to choose a solicitor, many institutions suggest that recommendation is the best route. This is highly questionable for the referrer could so easily be a criminal with a hidden agenda, and the recommended solicitor could be a knowing component in fraudulent or criminal schemes. You MUST take all possible precautions to establish the credentials of the solicitor you are thinking of using, and those of the referrer.

The point of  including this here may  well  become apparent to a discerning reader in this next letter.
Ingram Winter Green are PART OF  . . SUCCESSION London
From  http://www.successionlondon.co.uk/whoweare.htm
Succession London brings together four partners who have considerable experience and expertise in facilitating the exit of business owners. We provide a one-stop shop that will assist the Business Link adviser.
Trinity Financial Limited -(a member of Berkeley Independent Advisers Ltd)  specialised financial advice to the owner.
Unity Corporate Advisers @ Unity Trust Bank - advice on all stages of the buyout process.
Tossers Ingram Winter Green - advice on the most appropriate legal structure and tax issues.
Tower Hamlets CDA - project planning of ownership transfer and employee participation and productivity.
We are also linked to the Family Business Planning Unit of the Anglia Polytechnic University, which is part of their Centre for Business Transformation, and this provides a research input into the project.

From http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2005/128.shtml
FSA/PN/128/2005
1 December 2005
The Financial Services Authority ("FSA") today imposed a public censure on Berkeley Independent Advisers Limited ("BIA") for system and control breaches. These breaches resulted in a failure to monitor adequately a sales strategy which advocated the sale of non-pension products as an alternative means of saving for retirement and a failure to ensure the suitability of sales arising from this strategy.
From http://kays.webdadi.biz
/search.dtx
 Lying Solicitors  Ingram Winter Green are RECOMMENDED by Estate Agents KAY & Co
 wp713e1168.gif
Established in Marylebone in 1982, Kay & Co. is one of central London's leading firms of independent estate agents and property consultants.
Legals . . . A solicitor will be required to handle the legal paperwork involved. We recommend that you use a solicitor who knows the area that you are moving to and specialises in conveyancing. You may find these firms able to assist you:-
Ingram Winter Green
Tel: 020 7845 8400 (Nick Green or Geraldine Paletz)

 From http://www.Iwg-solicitors.co.uk/page24.html
Can IWG, Denniss Matthews, or Nathan Teitelbaum (Fineland Properties) confirm or deny the following???? I have asked them  all to do so before but as usual they have declined . . . .
So my understanding of  the IWG, Denniss Matthews, Fineland Properties “Granny Robbing Scheme” will stay here as FACT, as promised until they do deny it. (and I don’t mean a pernickety bit of it.)
The “Report by the Association of London Government” was undertaken very thoroughly, often by surreptitious methods including posing as potential sellers. They discovered a web of firms all interlinked and often owned by each other. . . (its a revealing document)
 Because of the prominence of my sites now (do a search . . .  IWG solicitors  . .  or MSN  . . “succession london”. and you’ll see what I mean) people are coming to me and telling me their tales. Because of that, I also, can confirm the findings of The ALG.
Not only are IWG involved, they are aggressively involved. Several cases I am now aware of show that Fineland Properties under the guise of several pseudonym companies, that are abandoned at the first hint of trouble, use Ingram Winter Green, namely Daniel Ginsbury. They also INSIST, but it’s not put like that at the time, that the unfortunate seller uses Denniss Matthews, namely Nigel Matthews  . . . which you might think is odd for the simple matter of the purchase of a Council Flat.
The reason becomes apparent later. The documents the unfortunate sellers are asked to sign  are first of all unsound and do not give the vendor full rights. Further the signing is not reciprocated by the purchaser Fineland Properties but the vendor is reassured by his (he thinks) solicitor Denniss Matthews . . . THEN the vendor is asked to leave the property without any money leaving Fineland Properties coffers. Then they make all sorts of claims that the property is not quite what they purchased. And very much reduced offers are then made to the vendor.

(you have to realise there is a lot of trust required in the RTB rip-off scam. Because the vendor does not technically sell the property for three years. Only the promise to do so. So it is possible for the vendor to technically own the property but be dispossessed of it. Which is the point of the “Granny Robbing Scheme”)
If the vendor is lucky they may not have left the premises (they  are usually asked to hand over the keys at Denniss Matthews BEFORE any transfer of money). But if they have not vacated they then receive all sorts of legal threats from IWG. (I have them in front of me)
Denniss Matthews of course pretend to be on the vendors side and make all sorts of noises that are of course meaningless, which is why they have to be picked to represent the vendor.
NOT content with the ridiculous profit to be made by abusing the RTB and effectively costing the Council tens of thousands of pounds the “Granny Robbers” want to minimise the incentive money too. Presumably this scheme allows this unholy trinity (there’s that word again) to offer higher incentive money  than the other vultures, that send out leaflets with only a mobile phone number (but no company name, I have a bundle of them in front of me) enticing unwary occupants away from Council tenancy.
They carry on like this with impunity since The Law Society are so corrupt they will not intervene, and The Police probably know them down at the Lodge.
This isn’t the only scheme they run between them. More on how  they buy ”PROBLEM” properties later.
The UNITY TRUST BANK  is owned by such august bodies as the TUC. Which through its member unions are always on at the Government and Local Authorities to provide more social AFFORDABLE housing. Presumably which, will later be fair game for the RTB vultures.
What are TOWER HAMLETS and UNITY TRUST BANK, doing in bed with the likes of INGRAM WINTER GREEN & BIA?

 Colin Clifford Cole
Who else can put a blank page at No 1 on  Google search? Coming soon  . . Vote Colin Cole & Ken Frost.
 Croydon Ratepayers Against Croydon Council
http://www.cracc.co.uk goes straight in at No 1
 Let’s get rid of the Labour Party in Croydon
. . . Why? . . . . Click here
A WARNING  to The Labour councilors / councillors of London Borough of CROYDON .  (typically ignored). . With a little mention of Jerry White-wash the LGO . . Local Government Ombudsman
 Help me oust Tony Newman Croydon Council LEADER. Labour have been there too long.
 Click here.
wp0e2e21a5_1b.jpg
Wilkins Kennedy
Green Leaf Management - A Unique Investment Opportunity - Property Investment

 Wanker Solicitors Ingram Winter Green are employed by
Green Leaf Management Ltd in association with Nat West Bank & Wilkins Kennedy Chartered Accountants.
So what have NatWest got in common with Unity Trust Bank?
 They are both have dealings with Lying Solicitors IWG.
 Click here
wp550f87e5.gif
Ingram Winter Green Solicitors
Bedford House,
21A John St.,
London WC1N 2BL
Bankers:
wp5a524844.jpg
NatWest
 116 Fenchurch Street
London
EC3M 5AL
Chartered Accountants:
wpbba43f5a.gif
Wilkins Kennedy
London Bridge
SE1 9QR
Lawyers:
These sites were created because Solicitors Ingram Winter Green and Denniss Matthews  will not respond to my many letters, and because The Law Society will not investigate all this:-
 The reason these sites are still here presumably, is because they are ALL not willing to answer the simple question . . “Did you or did you not conspire with your clients, S J Patel, Nathan & Ruth Teitelbaum of Fineland Properties Ltd,  to deliberately LIE, CHEAT and DECEIVE in order to DEFRAUD me of my  considerable claims against them?” . . well not in Court anyway. . . lying is one thing . . perjury another.  All the content of these sites is based on that premise, and NONE of it has ever been denied or even contested.
 For the removal of doubt, I have never called Daniel J Ginsbury “a lying, conniving, scheming piece of pig shit, low life life gutter scum”.
I merely ask the question? If all of the above is true would that make him one? Daniel Ginsbury declines to ans either the former or the latter. It is true that I accuse IWG of being a bunch of total Wankers for allowing these sites to be here and are not able to fathom a way out of this dilemma. Not worthy to call themselves Solicitors in fact.
“ I am going to presume that Nigel Matthews  @ Denniss Matthews Solicitors Anerley along with Daniel Ginsbury @ Ingram Winter Green Solicitors Bedford House and their clients Suryakant J Patel 2 Wickham Avenue Shirley and Fineland Properties Ltd, 43 Vincent Court (also known as Fine Land Properties Ltd. 2 Hillcrest Av. NW11 or Fineland Properties Ltd C/O Messrs Elliot Woolfe & Ros, Equity Hse, Edgeware ) . . . Reg owners Ruth Teitelbaum, 28 Overlea Road London, E5 9BG and Nathan Teitlebaum, Crest House, 34 Hillcrest Avenue, London NW11 0EN, CONSPIRED to lie, deceive and defraud me of my considerable claims in the matter of this dispute. . . See why ? .  . . Click here

 

More Granny swindling at Metcalfe Copeman & Pettefar, King’s Lynn

Click here.

DISCLAIMER . .  re MCP Law  Click here

My claims made on this  and other web sites are based on the fact that Metcalfe Copeman & Pettefar ( MCP Law ) refuse to answer even the most basic of questions. They should have no reason, unless to do so would embarrass them or their clients in disclosure of lies, connivance, and conspiracy. In exactly the same fashion as the IWG, Denniss Matthews conspiracy. I have asked them over and over again to tell the truth but they have declined. It is reasonable and correct therefore to make the assumptions that I have and that are printed through out these sites. MCP Law still have the opportunity to refute these claims if they wish . . . Provided they can prove it that is.

It never ceases to amaze me. What search engines make of your pages. It sometimes seems they know how to be ironic. These two results are top of page 1 on MSN Search . . . nscglobal ltd . . Which really must piss them off when you consider how much work they have done to try counteract those searches. . . all to no avail it seems

Jailbird MD nscglobal ltd Mohammed Yaseen or nscglobal MD Yaseen Khan?

Jailbird MD nscglobal Mohammed Yaseen or nscglobal MD Yaseen Khan? ... nscglobal employs only the best people in the industry. Individuals come from a wide spectrum of ... . . . what? prisons?
www.sir-ian-blair.co.uk/page26.html

nscglobal MD? Crook Mohammed Yaseen or Yaseen Kahn?

nscglobal MD? Crook Mohammed Yaseen or Yaseen Kahn? ... David Ingram is not only a Ptnr at these TOSSER Solicitors IWG , but a Director at NSC GLOBAL Ltd
www.sir-ian-blair.co.uk/page3.html ·  Show more results from "www.sir-ian-blair.co.uk".

WHO WANTS TO BE ON TV?

 

Are you a complainer? Do you believe we are entitled to good service? Do you think complaining is a good way to get it? Are you the sort of person who would do a web site like this if you were provoked enough? A major independent Television Company would like to hear from you. The Development Production Dept is looking for people who stand up for their rights and are proud to cause a fuss.  

 

 Click Here.

NOTICE TO ALL search engine, ISP’s, Nominet, Hosting Co’s, domain name providers and the like. ANY adverse legal content on my sites . . . . Is AT LEAST ONE YEAR OLD . . . but more likely 2 years old.  . . . and therefore is EXEMPT from prosecution in ANY form under UK Law by virtue of being OUT of STATUTE. Please ignore any threats of legal action. . . They will just be ‘trying it on’. . . besides it’s ALL true otherwise they would have sued me.as per Google search defamation limitation.Pre-action Protocol for Defamation In particular, time is always ‘of the essence’ in defamation claims; the limitation period is (uniquely) only 1 year www.justice.gov.uk/civil/procrules_fin/contents/protocols/prot_def.htm

Colin’s NEW sites
Barnett Ross Auctioneers. We laugh at money laundering forms.
www.barnett-ross.co.uk
www.barnettross.org.uk